Main | September 2005 »

August 31, 2005

Independence Day Reflection

...tanahair... ...adat dan budaya... ...sejarah... ...bangsa... ...tersingkir... ...ketidakadilan... ...kehilangan... ...kerendahan...

...keyakinan...
...kebangkitan...
...kemuliaan...
...keimanan...

Siapakah aku?

Oh Tuhan, bimbinglah hamba-hambaMu melalui samudera kehidupan yang sarat permasalahan ini. Kaulah keyakinan kami. Kaulah kemuliaan kami. Perkuatkanlah kami, utusan-utusan kasihMu, sehingga datangnya hariMu.

Minolta at Midnight

I'm in the midst of thesis-writing. At this moment in time, I'm just taking a brief recess, and I have decided to capture the way life is in my little world in real time:


On my desk (the equipment that sustains me in the present)


Below my desk (the lifeforms that keep me in touch with...well...life)


On my wall
(the faces that keep me focused on The Kingdom)
*This picture was retaken several hours later*

On my left (the literature that keeps me in touch with my thoughts)

My bedroom, my workstation, my library...all in one place...my little world from whence come all my reflections pertaining to God and life. How does my room take a bed, one wonders. I simply do without one.

My world is simple, really; but I will gladly share all I have with the less sophisticated who do not require much (which I do not have anyway).

Nope, I've never been a very neat person...you can tell from my thoughts. I'd like to think that my little world is an incarnational typification of life in the real world...no?
Work beckons.

August 30, 2005

The Way of Christ (6) : SELF-DENIAL

Self-denial is the recognition that there is a higher purpose than ourselves and a higher order of existence than the present order, and consequently, the abandonment of ourselves to this purpose. The order is nothing less than this: the Kingdom of God. Self-denial is thus the abandonment of one's preoccupations in this life, together with its accompanying bondages, so that one can be free to live and love unto and for the Kingdom of God.

Self-denial is to be free to. In denying ones' self, one becomes free. In recovering freedom by way of deliberate release, one truly begins to own one's life. We deny ourselves so that we can truly own ourselves. For it is in truly owning ourselves that we are free to choose to offer this self to the single-minded purpose of the Kingdom of God.

Self-denial is not to be undertaken by way of punishing ourselves and our bodies. In the history of mankind, there have been many who have thought by some form of infliction of pain upon one's self, that a more noble sense of the divine was to be attained. This defies the sacredness of the human body - and thereby the human person - whose body was crafted by the hands of its Author of Life. The body, with all its decadence that we perceive it to suffer, is not to be denigrated mindlessly and carelessly. It is an instrument to be offered unto the redemptive purpose of its Crafter.

In the spirit of self-denial, we no longer cling on to possessions, relationships, health, and the like. It is not that we no longer possess these things, but rather, that we are no longer bound by them. In denying ourselves, the clutches of these good things no longer have a hold on us. We are thereby free to exploit these things for the Kingdom of God. We are also released from a fear to lose these things; we are emancipated from a false and superficial security that somehow our lives are better lived under the mastery of these things.

Self-denial is such that we shall own, but we shall no longer possess. For everything that we own shall be offered unto the higher purpose of the Kingdom of God. In releasing ourselves unto a freedom to live, we are truly free to fulfill a life of purpose and obedience when we hear the voice of God beckon.

The Kingdom of God is built by those who learn to deny themselves for its sake. For those who deny themselves not, they may perhaps (just perhaps) still constitute a part of this Kingdom; but they will not be cooperative builders in accordance with the divine design of its Master Architect, for they are enslaved to a purpose of a lower order.

It is the natural inclination for the human mind to subjectively rationalise himself unto a faith that requires no denial of the self. Yes, there is space within the human conscience for such false rationalisations indeed. For after all, to venerate anything or anyone other than God is actually to venerate one's self. But the cross of Christ - the ultimate symbol of suffering and self-denial - beckons unto the Christian to embrace the call to self-denial. It calls the Christian to rise beyond the voices of a thousand other seemingly similar gospels to embrace the Gospel of the God who carried his cross. For he is the God who said "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me".

There are some who may say that self-denial should not be overly emphasised, for one must seek a balance in one's faith. But the God who called us unto faith has never ordained a balanced faith. His is a faith in which one must either choose him or choose one's self. And to choose him, one must abandon the self. There is no balance. Only choice.

August 28, 2005

His Little Secret

Sherman had dinner with a friend today. Over a conversation at the table, the issue of religion emerged (which had never happened before throughout the course of their friendship). The friend asked Sherman why he had never spoken to him about Christianity in their two years of friendship; wasnt' that what Christians were supposed to do? Sherman froze for a moment because the topic of faith had never arisen between them before. He thoughtfully answered, "It has never been my intention to preach Christianity at you, although you have known all along that I am a Christian minister. Beyond all this, my only motivation has been to appreciate your friendship regardless of whether or not you choose to be a Christian one day. Of course, my life has always (I hope) been an invitation to others to live in accordance with the way of Jesus Christ. But whether or not you choose to live in the way of Christ, the more important thing to me is that we have no hidden agenda between us other than to appreciate each other as friends". Sherman's friend stared at him (in disbelief?) for a brief moment and said "I've never seen this before; it's totally different from what I have experienced with Christians". Sherman was a little uncomfortable; but he eventually answered, "I guess most Christians who do what they do are just expressing their devotion to Christ in the best way they know how. Along the way, they must have - rightly or wrongly - learned or been taught that this was what a good Christian should do. But yeah, I can imagine how it must feel for you".

The friend replied, "Sherman, I'm so proud that you're my friend", to which Sherman reciprocated, "And I am proud to be your friend".

A while later, Sherman wished his friend farewell...and the friend asked, "Are we meeting again tomorrow?"

Sherman beamed in delight. He had presented the way of Christ to someone whom he could simply call "a friend". Someone who wanted to eat with him again. Above all, he was happy - truly happy - that he had made a friend in the way that Christ did.

Sherman secretly patted himself on the back...but that's a secret.

Dominus Vobiscum

Remember the cross


Remember the way of the cross


Dominus Vobiscum: The Lord be With You...

August 27, 2005

The Way of Christ (5) : SOLITUDE

There is a secret place within yourself. It is a place that belongs solely to you, for no one else must enter. It is the place that is to be found in the innermost depths of your soul, from which your deepest thoughts and emotions find its source. It is the place in which you will find the deepest sense of connection with yourself if you would be a frequent visitor there.

And yet, perhaps, it is the place within you that you most fear, for there you will find yourself as you truly are. Few love what they see in themselves. And yet, if you are to live authentically, you must enter and discover the reality that emerges from that place within you. It is there that you will uncover reasons for the words that you speak and the actions that you perform.

The key to that place is one of silent contemplation and quiet confidence. There is little meaning to be found in noise and haste. If there is one virtue most people lack in the modern currents of life, it is one of quiet confidence and solitude. All too often, man has tried to drown himself in the noisy currents of “human progress” in order that he may conceal his own hollowness. He constructs worldly empires as monuments that affirm his perception of himself. With health and wealth, he fears nothing. He scales every height and explores every depth on the face of the earth. He uncovers every corner of the universe. And yet, his achievements still leave him wanting, for the one place he fears to enter is that secret place within him. Over the years, he has acquired the skill of isolating himself from that secret place, for it renders him more vulnerable than he dares to be.

But such is the paradox of life; it is only in vulnerability and weakness that one can truly discover authenticity and meaning in existence. It is only from solitude that one can emerge to contribute a meaningful symphony to the senseless noise of life. It is only in the solitude of that place that the voice of God may be heard most clearly, for it is there that one can come to him as one truly is. It is there that one can truly meet with God; neither in the resounding noise of life nor the currents of progress, but only in the stillness of solitude.

Welcome to the world of self-awareness.

August 26, 2005

Blogging about Blogging

I am in the midst of preparing a sermon on Matthew 18:15-20. But I need to get something off my chest before I can continue with my sermon preparations...

These past couple of days have been mentally (not intellectually) engaging for me. The reason for this was my whole venture into the blogging arena. See, the baby steps in my blogging efforts (as with most people) started in Blogger. All was well and fun. Until I decided it was time for me to acquire my own domain name and republish my entire blog through FTP (a fundamental rule of blogging: when you can't explain something, link). This entire process of setting up my new domain and transferring the contents of my blog from Blogger's server to my own web space server confronted me with the idiocy of my own incompetence in mechanisms of web publishing.

It hit me that if I had not received the kind of help I did (I'm sure the kind helper would rather remain anonymous), my blog wouldn't be up by now. This begs the question of how I am ever going to survive my blogging career in the many years to come. Believe it or not, I find it to be a most disturbing reality that someone else can read manuals and follow the steps described therein, only to emerge with more than presentable-looking blogs, whilst I will have to be solely reliant on a template for the rest of my life. I cannot even specify the FTP pathway without knowing that I don't in fact understand what it means!

I suppose blogging is not a field that I can pursue the way many other people do, who can meddle with the technicalities of the enterprise and custom-design their own blogs to contain specific features they desire to have. Perhaps I have to - by way of sheer incompetence - settle with the reality that I love to blog simply because I have many things to say that I would not normally like to verbalise in the midst of a live audience. And this means that I will keep having to solicit help in alleviating the sufferings caused by technical challenges of my blogging career, just so that I can keep having the luxury of just blogging.

That's all I wanted to say. Just to confront the cloud of self-pity that has befallen me from a disability uncovered. Blogging rules.

Talking about Talking

I have been reflecting on the dynamics of conversations that have been taking place among theologically-oriented people (not in one specific instance, but rather, over my brief seven years of sustained theological interaction). We quarrel. Yes, we do. And these conflicts may at times lead to the destruction of what once used to be cordial relationships.

One wonders, what might be a better way for such conversations to take place? And how can the dynamics of such conversations pertaining to theological convictions be regulated in order to avoid unnecessary conflict?

Perhaps one does well to begin with an acknowledgement that language is an absolutely deficient vehicle of expression regarding things of the absolute. But that does not in itself mean that there is no absolute. What it does mean is that we should never assume our linguistic reflections of absolute truth to be exhaustive in itself. After all, if the Lord of the Christian faith has claimed that Truth is embodied in the form of a Person ("I am the Way, the Truth and the Life"), it would then follow that no language can exhaustively express the reality of this Truth (the Person).

Hence, what we should seek to do is to enter conversations as learners rather than teachers. It is naive to enter any conversation with the assumption that our competence in establishing the truth will invariantly lead to acceptance of that "truth" itself. Even if our logical constructions of our truth prevail above those of the other person, the question remains..."so what?"

I desire to be more inclined, in such conversations, to be focused on the "personhood of the other" rather than on the "truth that I seek to establish". Increasingly, I am beginning to realise that the Truth I claim to believe in lives within me, and I must seek to be an embodiment of that truth by establishing authentic friendships with those I desire to converse with. I must choose to perceive them as friends along the journey rather than opposition treading on separate paths.

In the process of argumentative debates, my verbal claims of the Truth that I believe in may demean the personhood of the other. Furthermore, these claims seldom lead one to conviction, and even if they do, only grudgingly. But the living of truth and the sharing of truth from a companion who honours and respects the "otherness" of his fellow friends advances the prospect of radical impact. Marshall McLuhan is correct: the medium is the message. In bringing the message of truth and love and redemption, I must be the embodiment of this very message I seek to carry.

What is the point in correcting people's misperceptions about God if my very approach in correcting those misperceptions itself gives rise to even greater misperceptions?

August 25, 2005

Announcement: The Crossover


Welcome to www.ShermanKuek.net ! Okay, I'm just trying to sound normal and happy here, but in actuality, I'm terribly confused. All this HTMLs and FTPs and what have you...they're all confounding me as much as the postmoderns do. No, really. **insert wink**

Well, here we are...I'm not sure how long it will take to sort out the major issues like the restoration of all my pictures that have been lost from www.shermankuek.blogspot.com. But I am well-aided with worthily intelligent assistance, so I am assuming that it will all be sorted out within the next couple of days.

Meanwhile, the blog entries still proceed as usual...pictureless though they may be.

Kick your shoes off, have fun, and make yourself at home in my messy living room. It's free for all who would kindly concede to my humble invitation to communal friendship...

August 24, 2005

The Way of Christ (4ii) : SOLIDARITY

At another level, solidarity is to be cultivated among those who have heeded the invitation to live under the reign of God and his Kingdom-order. We know that the Kingdom of God is not of this world although the two dimensions co-exist. Whilst our citizenship finds validity in both dimensions (the earthly order and the divine order), our way of life is to be reflective of the higher order of personhood within the Kingdom of God.

In accordance with the new Kingdom principle of life, solidarity is to be present in a most unusual way among professing followers of Christ Jesus. For Jesus himself, at the inauguration of the Kingdom during the course of his earthly life, had radically redefined the meaning of solidarity.

He changed the course of earthly family relations by establishing familial relations of an eternal order. Family, in accordance with the Kingdom, is no more simply about blood relations. It is about spiritual relations within communities that share meaning in their relationship with one another and with their Saviour and Lord. It is about being brothers and sisters to some, and being parents and children to yet some others, in a very real sense, and yet without requiring biological ties to regulate such relationships. It is about the voluntary yielding of one's allegiance to others within the community even if the worldly order finds an absence of necessity for such.

In Christ, the person who does the will of God is my brother or sister - in a very real sense. In Christ, the person who guides, loves, and accompanies me in my faith journey is my parent - in a very real sense. The reality of this communal solidarity finds its legitimacy beyond the worldly order. It is the order of the Kingdom.

What if you were told that within the order of this Kingdom, one should never - NEVER - claim exclusive ownership of his possessions? What if you were told that within the order of this Kingdom, one's claims of ownership over all possessions are dissolved such that one should never even claim sole ownership of his own life and and its accompanying rights?

Such is the Kingdom-life. It is where solidarity finds its deapest embodiment, wherein each person in submitting to the rule of God abandons his rights and offers himself to the service of others within the community. He renders himself and his possessions vulnerable to the exploitations of others, for his greatest treasure is now God and his neighbours. And for them and unto them, he shall live and love.

Announcement: My Story about Me

This blog is fast becoming a website of its own! But who's saying anything, right?

Just for the record, I want to thank Revd Sivin Kit for the tremendous pressure he has slammed upon me to begin this blogging enterprise (well, nah, it wasn't so hard...I'm disgracefully gullible). And also, a big word of thanks to Wai Nyan for helping me to tweak the blog in the hazardous engine room (and yes, this one was hard!).

Now, this is the real announcement: I have taken the liberty to make some major modifications to the page on my personal profile. Why? Just so I can know me better; yeah.

Once again, watch out for the soon-to-be change of my blog address from www.shermankuek.blogspot.com to www.ShermanKuek.net. It should be taking place really soon, although I am not entirely sure when.

Okay, now back to The Way of Christ (4ii): SOLIDARITY. Coming soon...

Announcement: Bloghead's Headblog

Just an interim announcement. I like how this blogging enterprise has turned out for me. It has now, just within a brief span of several weeks, become such an effective platform of intellectual release for me. It is a way of expressing my thoughts in such a way that they can be communicated without being tainted by somebody else's political agenda. I like it!

So this is an official Sherman on the Mount announcement: this web log will in the next couple of days (or weeks, depending on how fast I manage to get the mechanism going) become www.ShermanKuek.net and no longer www.ShermanKuek.blogspot.com.

To the man who has made this absolutely affordable for me...thank you, my friend. I deeply appreciate your friendship.

Please keep your eyes wide shut for further updates!

August 23, 2005

The Way of Christ (4i) : SOLIDARITY

Solidarity is a virtue to be cultivated within two dimensions of the Christian life.

At one level, we are called to live in solidarity with all creation and with the entire human race. The fact that we are followers of Christ does not make others less human than we are, for our stories are written by the hands of the same divine Author.

We seek not to treat others as those who are more ignorant than us simply because we possess knowledge of ultimate truth, for truth is to be shared among all who seek the deeper things in life. Furthermore, it is not that we have found truth, but rather, that the Truth has found us, lest anyone should walk this path in boastful arrogance.

In a spirit of solidarity, we walk the path of humanity by partaking in the sufferings of Christ (who himself, in so doing, was partaking in the sufferings of humanity). It is when we have partaken in the sufferings of humanity in the spirit of solidarity with all creation that we then earn the right to invite the world into the reign of God.

Solidarity with the human race also speaks of humble relationality. Whilst we have been found by the compelling love of Christ, we should never assume that we possess exhaustive knowledge of the way of Christ. Knowledge of Christ is never a right; it is a grace we all must share. It is crucial that in relating to others, we should open our hearts and minds to the experience of learning from the diversely rich experiences of others. Everyone has a story to tell (if we would only listen), even the seemingly silent people. Even those who have not confessed Christ may have something of the nature of Christ from within them to impart. After all, Christ is nevertheless their Maker.

Of course, it would be much more soothing to our human ego if we took it upon ourselves to be the storytellers rather than the listeners. But the way of Christ is (as always) different, for in listening to others' life stories, he spoke into and through those very stories they told of. And many found him through these, their stories.

Solidarity with the human race is about offering God's divine gift of friendship regardless of whether others will confess Christ. It is about being Christ - the Friend of sinners (our Friend) - to the world.


...to be continued in The Way of Christ (4ii) : SOLIDARITY...

August 21, 2005

Intermittent Introspection (1)

I am not one who thinks solely in abstracts, although I am often mistakenly perceived as such. In fact, much of my abstract-type thoughts are often provoked by tangibly empirical events that come my way as I seek to live my life in the best way I know how.

In keeping with the reality of daily routines, I often have surges of random thoughts (even in between series of progressive theologically-abstract blogging). So I have decided to express them in intermittent blog entries (in between all this theological blogging) that I have decided to call INTERMITTENT INTROSPECTION. So here I go:

[By the way, I'm definitely not finished with the present thought progression on The Way of Christ. I'm only one-third through the series so far.]

1. On Blogging
I am thus far quite happy with the way my blog has turned out. The number of visits I get is not that great, but I'm not sure I'm blogging for others as much as I'm blogging for myself. I'm probably my blog's most frequent visitor, in all honesty. This is not to say that I don't welcome visitations...I love company (short of saying that I'm desperate for company)! And I love the way the "tingles down my spine" feel when I receive comments about how nice my new blog banner is and how catchy my blog name is. But it's probably a very fine line between blogging one's honest thoughts through authentic expression and blogging to serve the interest of the blog-surfing populace. Ah, the idealism of a juvenile blogger. Grow up, Sherman.

I think this facility provided by Blogger.com has done a great service to HTML-deficient amateurs like me. I am almost perfectly happy with how my blog looks. I have only two gripes. Firstly, I would love to have a feature in the Blogger.com interface that enables me to categorise my blog entries. This enables me to distinguish, say, blog entries on theology from blog entries on dogs (although in my world, the two are not necessarily distinguishable). Secondly, I would've loved to have my own domain (www.shermankuek.net) and sufficient web space to host all that I need to have on my blog. But thus far, it seems too expensive an enterprise.

2. On McDon-Al
Yesterday evening (since it's already wee hours of the morning now) I was seated for some two hours at a McDonald's restaurant in Singapore with a brother. Whilst he was busy blogging away on my Dell Inspiron 700M (because McDonald's restaurants in Singapore have WiFi facilities), I couldn't help eavesdropping on a major conversation that was taking place between a teenage boy and a teenage girl across our table. I obviously have no idea who they are, so I will herein call the boy "Al" and the the girl "Gal".

Al was spending those couple of hours - and I emphasise here, loudly and clearly, so it's understood that my eavesdropping was entirely involuntary - complaining to Gal about how he had simply lost the desire to attend church any longer. He was explaining that he had already left church for some weeks now, and everyone there would most likely be thinking that he had backslidden. However, he saw no point in going back to church because everyone was so fake. It also disappointed him that his leaders were often trying to "use" him to the advantage of the church and would not let him rest from burdensome responsibilities. I suppose he wanted to just be left alone to love God in peace.

This conversation sounded too familiar for me to lay back without desiring to respond in any way. At the spur of the moment, there was a surge in my adrenalin supply, and I was at the verge of walking across the table to shake his hand and say "Look here man, I understand your problem, so let me help you..." But then a staggering voice from within my heart invalidated my intentions when it said "What makes you think you have the solution? Last I heard, you were part of the problem."

As painful as it was, I had no right to offer help. I headed home. Rightly or wrongly.

But I will pray for Al tonight. Lord, direct him in your way.

And I will pray for myself. Kyrie eleison.

The Way of Christ (3) : SUFFERING

The gospel of Jesus Christ beckons powerfully to a sufferer.

There exist two kinds of Christian suffering:

The first kind of suffering is epitomised by those who voluntarily embrace it as a spiritual virtue. Such voluntary suffering is a natural outcome of one’s recognition of the radical difference in godly values as opposed to self-centred human values, and one’s consequent ambition to pursue a life characterised by such godly values. To think and to live God’s way invites ridicule and insult (and sometimes, more than that). The voluntary sufferer, in submitting to the reign of God in his life, also invites upon himself or herself the sufferings that befell God. Yes, God suffered.

The second kind of suffering is that which occurs as a natural consequence of one’s less-than-perfect state of existence. It is most often found in situations of sickness, loss and deprivation. It is true that the search for reason in human suffering has never been entirely resolved by philosophical ventures. And yet, the story of God’s people has demonstrated time and again that many such sufferers have found their experiences to have enforced such a great sense of their own helpless inability, and as a result, have turned their hearts intimately towards the things of God. In their struggle to make meaning out of their suffering, they make space within their lives for a redefinition of “meaning” itself in accordance with divine design.

There is a subtly unspoken but strongly redemptive value in suffering. Suffering presents the prospect of redeeming man to God. It reminds man of the reality of his own fragility and his inability to sustain himself. Suffering breaks the will of man and enforces the will of God. It reminds man that it is God who actively sustains the order of all creation every minute of every day. It shifts the human person from an addiction to self-defined freedom towards a freedom to depend on the Author of all life. It accords the man the freedom to live in a desirable attitude of brokenness.

Suffering also connects the human experience with the reality of Christ’s suffering. To suffer because Christ suffered is to be like the Christ who suffered. In expressing the suffering of Christ in one’s own life, one also connects with the sufferings of his fellow human persons. To suffer as Christ did is to authentically present our humanness to the world, and in so doing, to prevent the lie that following Christ abruptly causes the madness of human imperfection to cease.

If there is one language that speaks universally to human persons of every tribe and tongue, it is the language of suffering. It is strange what suffering begets. It produces an intense pain that possesses the potential to minister healing to a hurting world. It is to do for the world that which God did for us.

Or rather, it is to do together with the world what God did together with us.


August 19, 2005

The Way of Christ (2) : SACRIFICE

In order for us to comprehend what sacrifice is, we must first understand what sacrifice is not. Sacrifice is not purposed for the cultivation of self-assurance. It is not for the narcissistic purpose of appeasing our own need to feel noble or to receive praise. It is not to be undertaken with the intention to receive honour, for in conceding to receive honour from sacrifice, the integrity of sacrifice itself is inevitably compromised.

In fact, sacrifice is most powerful when it becomes so much an innate expression of ourselves that it can no longer be contained within a specific event. It is most powerful when sacrifice itself is no longer obvious, this being so by virtue of a person's life being rendered synonymous with sacrifice itself, such that the person and his sacrificial life can no longer be distinguished one from the other.

In other words, our spiritual journey must progress from that of giving on identifiably isolated occasions to that of living our lives as a constant offering to God and to our neighbours.

But sacrifice is the enterprise of a fool. For it is only the fool who renders himself for the advantage of others, at his own expense. And only the greater fool offers of his resources for the happiness of his neighbours, only to have himself experience a greater happiness derived from the joy of offering. Sacrifice is surely not the way of the world.

Sacrifice is an outward expression of an inward self-denial. In denying the self, we are not hating ourselves, but rather, loving ourselves as people whose offerings are worthy of God and our neighbours. And yet, this love is a self-giving and self-offering love. It extends itself towards the welfare of the Kingdom of God. We offer ourselves for the sake of the Kingdom of God, even to the extent of being exploited.

But when is it morally wrong to allow one's self to be exploited? When the exploitation is against the interest of the exploiter. The benchmark for morality is never the self. As far as it serves the moral and spiritual welfare of our neighbours (and therefore, the cause of the Kingdom), we must avail ourselves to be exploited as offerings to the world and for the Lord. However, such exploitation must cease when instead of serving, it becomes detrimental to the moral and spiritual welfare of our neighbours and the Kingdom of God.

Jesus lived his life as an offering for all. His sacrifice did not begin at the cross, although it culminated there. His sacrifice began at his birth as an infant, from whence he offered his all for those who would exploit his love and goodness. Every minute of every second, his life was an offering, a divinely appointed sacrifice. Jesus was the ultimate fool who would not only present an offering, but who would also make himself the offering. He was God's own fool.

Where is the wise?

August 17, 2005

The Way of Christ (1) : SIMPLICITY

We endeavour to embrace the self-emptying virtue of simplicity in the way of Christ. Simplicity is not really about settling into a state of deprivation, but rather, about liberating one’s self from the bondage of the cluttered life. Simplicity creates time and space for the cultivation of the deeper things in life.

And yet, one must not - in one’s preoccupation with simplicity itself - be consumed by one’s fixation on simplicity itself. Simplicity must never be an end in itself. It must be embraced for a higher purpose, which is that of connecting with God and one’s neighbours by way of the extended time and space afforded from the cultivation of simplicity itself. The simplicity of the uncluttered life releases us to live as an offering to God and to our neighbours.

It is herein that the Christian interpretation of simplicity is most distinct. Simplicity is, to us, a virtue not because the uncluttered life benefits ourselves (for the self must never constitute the primary motivation for any endeavour in the Christian life). It is a virtue because it cultivates an attitude of divine connection and because it benefits our neighbours.

Simplicity is not about retreating or withdrawing from the currents of societal order. Whilst we are not of the world, we must never live as though we were not also in the world. Hence, the Christian life requires that one lives in active engagement by journeying with the world to discover a better way to live. It is not material possessions themselves, but rather, the desire for and the fixation upon these possessions that clutter our lives. Simplicity is about a withdrawal from this desire whilst still maintaining responsible stewardship of these possessions such that they are exploited solely for the good of the Kingdom of God.

Simplicity ceases to be a virtue when one cultivates it simply for the purpose of self-release as the primary end. When (in embracing simplicity) one’s life ceases to be an offering to God and to the world, simplicity no longer constitutes a virtue; it is thereafter translated into a self-centred enterprise although its visible expressions may look invariantly similar.

This is the way of Christ, our Master and Lord, who himself is the Way: He embraced simplicity for the sake of God and for the world. He emptied himself and embraced the uncluttered life, and we are thus called to do likewise.

August 16, 2005

Doggy's Day at the DoGtor's

Carissa is six months old now and at the verge of experiencing her first heat. So this morning was her day at the doctor. She went through a surgery which we call "spaying", duringwhich her uterus (which the doctor said was very small) and her ovaries (which the doctor said were very slippery) were removed.

A slightly painful surgery indeed (which surgery isn't?), but necessary for the prevention of irresponsible breeding and also for the prevention of mammary tumour during the doggy's later stage of her life cycle. Basically, to help her to remain a happy doggie for as long as she lives. She is now recuperating at home, and will take about five days to recover.

For my dear friend who has requested to see doggy pictures, here's one of Carissa's for you!

August 15, 2005

O Happy Day

A sketchy thought (just something clever I accidentally came up with):


People seek authentic relationships before they seek truth. If you desire to communicate truth, then you must first of all be an agent of authentic and sacrificial relationships.

Okay, now on to some real life-changing dynamically phenomenal update for the day:

In regard to this post, the package arrived at my doorstep this morning at 10.45 or thereabout. Click on this link to faint from overwhelming envy.

I realise that with all the recent posts on my latest acquisitions (which will not persist, I promise - I mean the acquisitions, not the posts), I'm coming across as a tech-junkie. For one, I really cannot help it because most of my colleagues are tech-junkies themselves. For another, being born to a mother who gets excited over new computers and wireless modems and who has a wide network of friends globally from her chatting career doesn't quite help (but hey, how cool is that!)

But there are certainly other aspects of life I spend time exploring. For example, I have been exploring the intriguing world of monastic orders (even visited one in Rome and stayed there for a while). So I guess I am more than just a tech junkie...I'm a tech-monkey.

P.S. Oh...oh...and read this. Lord, have mercy on me, the unrepentant sinner. (**Beats chest**)

August 14, 2005

Post-Conference Purchase

The story goes like this:

During the conference, participants were asked to congregate in the plaza for a photo-taking session. And so the photographer went "Everyone say 'ES...chatology'!" And snap snap snap!

As all this was going on, I told myself, "I need a camera. Something that is good and small enough for me to want to carry it with me everywhere I go." So yesterday evening, I went to an IT Mall with my buddy, and this was the result:



Konika Minolta Dimage X60
(Click on link to get jealous.)


The financial damage from the "dimage" is depressing. Other than that...oh well...ESchatology!

Post-Conference Dissonance

I have just completed a round of conference on Church and Society in which a series of academic papers were presented.

...predictable...

...politically correct...

...non-provocative...

...superficial positivism...

...hidden agenda...

...evasive...

Well, what's new. Politics is rampant even in the academia. That about says it all, I guess. So much for the sincere pursuit of knowledge.

The Postmodern Postmortem (Epilogue)

I have said much, hopefully in the right spirit and attitude.

I suppose I said these things more for myself than for anyone else. But I would certainly invite listeners who may deem these murmurs of a novice worth their hearing. Perhaps, in the process, I will myself be confronted with my own ignorance on matters pertaining to the reading of my own culture and context.

One thing that I have hoped to drive across in this brief treatise is the imperative of the Christian responsibility to read our respective cultures and contexts. Whilst it is easy to settle on the merry end of neat categories and secure propositions, such a stand also assumes that we already know the heart and mind of God in whole (or at least, sufficiently). I wouldn't dare assume that myself.

I see myself - like the Buddhist, the Muslim, the Hindu, the Taoist, and even the professing atheist (all of whom co-exist with me in my local context) - as being on a journey towards knowing my Creator. In the midst of this search, Jesus found me, and for that I am eternally grateful. In Christ's confrontation, I have already been confronted by the very Person who is, himself, TRUTH. And beyond all humanly crafted truth propositions (much of which I do embrace), my deepest desire is to know him. I turn to Christ. I confess Christ.

Hence, whilst I do hold on to much of Western propositions in regard to my faith, it is not my intention to confront anyone with these propositions. All I would like for my life to be is an invitation for others to share in my life journey, so that they too may meet with the Christ who came to meet me. If I am able to cultivate an understanding of my life as a sacrament of Christ, then those who meet me meet Christ, and those who touch me touch Christ.


I realise that this approach is a radical adventure, because it is entirely different from the kind of fossilised gospel that has been passed down to me. It presents dangers that go beyond predictable proportions. But to start with, what decision could be more dangerous than that of following Jesus? Since I have made that decision to follow Christ, I might as well persist with utmost integrity in this path that is "paved with good intentions" and maybe "littered with broken dreams" (to quote a song I once heard).

I believe that if I am able to understand the role of the Christian community (the Church) as a traditioning body and a historical entity, my efforts for re-construction will not pander to deviance. These efforts will, rather, refresh the meaning of much of our tradition that has been drowned in the sea of forgetful oblivion.

August 12, 2005

The Postmodern Postmortem (Part 5)

I have hopefully been very careful not to be anti-Western in my theological stance or to over-react towards the theological legacy that has been passed down to me. One must never forget that such legacies can be precious gifts. Western theology (and education as a whole, in fact) has empowered me to further exploit the capacities of the mind in my personal search for a deeper knowledge of God, so that I may love him deeper. It is precisely my exposure towards Western theology that has provoked me to move beyond its own categories.

Perhaps attempting to develop new Asian theological categories does not necessitate a rejection of Western theological categories after all. It just requires that I move beyond such familiar categories. Just because I seek to move beyond Western theological categories does not mean that I am herein rejecting the propositional and confessional claims of Western Christianity.


This argument arises out of the reality that theology is contextual. If theology is the language of the Church (or in popular language, the Christian community’s God-talk), then Asians need to learn to articulate our understanding of the person of Christ in our own language and cultural paradigm. Far from indicating that this attempt is an insulting rejection of my inclination towards Western theology, it in fact does justice to that for which a large segment of the respectable theological arena would stand. In fact, I know more than one respectable scholar who would applaud my feeble attempt at being both truly Christian and truly Asian.

All theology is contextual in that it arises out of a certain pressing context of the day. A case in point is the doctrine of the Trinity itself. Just because I do not deem a need to overly analyse the doctrine of the Trinity does not in any way mean that I have rejected the metaphysical reality of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It simply means that I do not see a need to overly emphasise this issue (as if someone else was denying that my God was Trinity and I was required to defend him), for the issue itself bears no grave consequence in my day and context. What I need to do as an Asian Christian is to move beyond these categories and find new categories that can helpfully develop the Asian paradigm of Christianity…whilst still worshipping the Trinitarian God without having to overly defend his being (since I don't hear anyone attacking this claim).

I understand the insecurity of some theological scholars that I deeply honour and respect insofar as concerns their adamant refusal to move beyond dogmatic categories. They have spent many years of their lives tidying up their framework of beliefs and have finally retired into a state of “theological sensibility”. At this point, anything appearing to be antithetical that emerges from a source beyond their own framework of dogmatic thought must be killed in an instance, lest it should pose the threat of messing up their currently tidy theological paradigm and obligating a new lease of efforts to deconstruct and reconstruct. But to kill a new idea before it even is given a space to bloom in equal glory is to work against the charitable nature of the Lord we claim to love. For all we know, the sources from which come these seemingly new ideas are equally committed to loving God as we are.

I propose that the only way by which one can overcome such theological insecurities is to embrace the enterprise of theology as spiritual discipline. We are, after all, pilgrims on a journey. My employment of the term “journey” is hopefully a nuanced indication of something that is dynamic and changing (hopefully for the better). In this spiritual discipline, I seek to move beyond the confinements of my own theological categories and move about in this theological garden of a hundred other categories, and allowing them all to interact with my own categories. But this of course presupposes that I have allowed all these hundred other voices to grow in a state of equality relative to my own voice. In the process of such interaction, I would have been confronted by various conflicting ideas and be forced into a process of re-examination. It is a tiring endeavour, but never tiresome. If I am able to embrace “theology as a path to holiness” (as suggested by St Bonaventure), then this spiritual discipline becomes a dynamic exercise in my life. And theology itself becomes dynamic.

Perhaps I am in the same breath, therefore, affirming that theology can never and should never be jealously fossilised. Such protectionism deprives one of a deeper growth in one’s own spiritual journey as much as it deprives others who have equally meaningful ideas to contribute. But as a safeguard to ensure that our theological creativity and explorations do not pander to disaster, I have tried to establish (in my previous post – Part 4) some guidelines for our theological methodology.

Hence, my (hopefully humble) quest for a more authentic understanding of what it means to be an Asian Christian.

August 11, 2005

The Postmodern Postmortem (Part 4)

I am still on the subject of theological language and categories. Thus far, it should be apparent that my problem-definition has been socio-historical in nature. My reason for this is that postmodernity in the West has been spoken of in like manner, and the starting point of my entire thought process was this very Western discourse at both the theological and the popular levels. Whilst I have demonstrated (perhaps far too inadequately) that postmodernity is not a relevant problem for Asia, colonialism is very much relevant to us, since it is a historical reality in my part of the world.

I cannot emphasise enough the case for which I am arguing above – that our struggle is a post-colonial one, and not a postmodern one. In my mind, even a marginal deviation from this emphasis poses the unfortunate prospect of a digression in my efforts. And because our struggle is not postmodernity but post-colonialism, we are not herein reckoning with the tension between theological liberalism and theological orthodoxy as is the case in the West. In fact, such an insignificantly marginal segment of the Christian community here is theologically unorthodox that their presence poses almost no concern to the rest of the community. Our battle is, however, against the unthinking Evangelical imperialism which suffocates the prospect of authentic expression in our Asian Christianity. It locks theology up within the confines of Western cultural realities. This cultural imperialism, as I have mentioned, has shifted from high-culture imperialism to low-culture imperialism. We are therefore endeavouring to emerge with a “generous orthodoxy” of another kind.

However, in proposing this third way beyond the traditional (high-culture imperialism) and the Church Growth Movement (low-culture imperialism), it is not sufficient for me to rest my construction solely on such a socio-historical analysis of the prevalent contemporary culture. My reasons for this argument are as follows:

a. Life consists of multi-factorial considerations. To assume a mono-factorial socio-political consideration is naïve. There are certainly other factors that come into play when attempting to construct a third way. For example, the Asian people – beyond their socio-political consciousness – are primarily and innately religious people. Their senses pertaining to the “transcendental other” is strong. Furthermore, religions in Asia exist not singularly, but plurally; and they co-exist to form a myriad of various worldviews. It is understandable that since secularism proliferated the Western worldview, that innate religious sense has been almost obliterated, although not all together. But this is precisely the reason for Western discussions resting largely on socio-political concerns. We in Asia cannot afford to dwell on that level alone, for even our socio-political agenda is most often driven by religious sensibilities.

b. Western theology is not entirely undesirable. To rest my critique solely on Western theological “failure” is to be terribly disrespectful and ungrateful of the positive contributions of the Western Church to the Church Universal. The Western Church is not to be blamed for speaking in theological categories and approaching their God-talk from a rationalistic approach (which arose from their own historical realities). This is only being human! Perhaps one day, we in Asia may also emerge with similar categories! Hence, I will go only as far as acknowledging the historical error of having imposed this language upon the Asian people.

c. Christianity is a historical faith, and Western theology is part of this historical reality. In other words, what is done is done. If we had been conquered by Russia in the course of history, we would similarly be struggling with Eastern Orthodox theology. And human history has evolved such that the most vibrant period of Christian vitality occurred in the Western context during the medieval days. We cannot go about constructing our theological language as if theology did not arise out of a historical period; no theology exists in a vacuum, and all theology is contextual. Since Christianity is a historical faith, it develops. Similarly, the Church’s talk about God must develop and evolve as well.

Therefore, I am suggesting that our construction of an Asian theological language must take in account various other considerations. Very briefly, they are:

i. Asian religious traditions. This means that we must somehow embrace a mechanism that enables us to examine the various worldviews co-existing with Asian Christianity. Examples of this are the Muslim concept of monotheism, the Hindu concept of karma, the Buddhist concept of enlightenment, the Taoist concept of the yin and yang, and the Confucian concept of social order and communal obligation. Fundamental to any socio-political and historical realities such as colonialism, the primary characteristic of Asians is our religious inclination. Perhaps, our inquiry may consequently yield more points of resonance with these religious worldviews that we have thus far cared to discover.

ii. The Great Tradition. May we not forget that Western Protestant theology constitutes a mere segment of the theology of the Church Universal. Other theological languages and categories are to be found in the traditions of the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. Whilst acknowledging the weaknesses of Protestant theology, we have a wider and longer heritage upon which to fall back to derive a richer Asian theological language. To conjure an Asian theological language that demonstrates no continuity from our faith in ages past is at best a dangerous enterprise, and at worst, potentially heretical. The element of "connectivity" and "rootedness" cannot be compromised. All these various streams of theological language and categories need to be examined and embraced to form what some scholars have come to know as The Great Tradition. It is herein that a generous orthodoxy possesses the potential to be embodied at its best.

These are just two major building blocks that will probably take us another several decades (or even centuries!) to handle proficiently before emerging with an authentic Asian theology. This process of mastery will undoubtedly involve arduous deconstructions and constructions at various levels.

It is true that all theology is contextual and that all these theologies arose from various socio-historical contexts. However, to fail to (at least attempt to) understand how our predecessors have interacted in their peculiar contexts – and thereby learning from their interactions – is to divorce ourselves from the historicity of the Christian faith. If this historical reality is the story of God and his people, can we afford to isolate ourselves from this story? It is for this reason that despite my often disillusioned sentiment with the way things are, I refuse to take leave from my faith community in search of something less rooted. I believe with all my heart that if I am ever going to revive a meaning in an Asian type of “generous orthodoxy”, I must learn from my spiritual parents of generations past.

More to come…

August 10, 2005

The Postmodern Postmortem (Part 3)

I am treading on this one very carefully, as I am aware that I may henceforth be unlocking a Pandora’s box. But if the embodiment of the gospel in our culture is an issue of such grave consequence, it would be worth walking on thin ice in order to do justice to the vitality of this enterprise.

I am not talking about a simple repackaging of the Western gospel to give it an Asian face. If theology is the language of the Christian community, then Western theology (with all its rationally constructed categories) is the language of the Western Christian community. If so, I am in effect proposing the construction of a theological language that emerges from the Asian Christian community.

The problem however lies in the historical reality that we have, in the course of history, inherited the theological language of the West. Hence, a vigorous deconstruction of this Western theological legacy needs to precede the construction of the proposed Asian theological language. (The word “deconstruction” is not to be taken as being synonymous with “destruction”. In employing the former word, I am referring to the critical re-examination of the Western theology that we have inherited, which can hopefully be followed by the necessary move away from and towards a variant direction that is more resonant with who we are as Asian people. But in effect, yes, I am propagating a shift in our paradigm of theology.)

This sounds scary. I know. As a student of Western theology and philosophy myself, I realise that in saying all these things, I am probably shooting myself in the foot. I have invested the past nearly seven years of my life studying Western theology (or at best, “Asian theologies” that employ Western theological categories). To have come to a realisation that my journey thus far has revealed a deep dislocation between who I am as an Asian Christian and the theological language I have acquired is itself painful experience for me. And I endeavour to pursue this matter further only because of my obligation to learn to love God through my “createdness” as an Asian Christian. And even so, I am utterly aware that I have become so categorically Western in my thinking and linguistic abilities that I can only walk this path with this handicap, trusting the Lord to help me as I seek a deeper understanding of what the gospel of Jesus Christ must mean for me and my people.

Theological deconstruction and reconstruction is a very insecure enterprise. It requires a double portion of humility and self-denial. I realise that it is about my willingness to release myself from the clutches of a secure and tidy world, to allow myself to be corrected and to render myself sufficiently vulnerable for the formation of a new language with which I am not familiar. Every step of the way, I will be reminding myself of my own incapacity and my need to trust the Holy Spirit to lead me in my search to know Christ better and to love him deeper.

But at the outset, I want to affirm this: I believe that the important guiding rule in my journey is to love the Lord with all my heart and all my soul and all my mind and all my strength, and to love my neighbour as myself. Let this be the deepest and sole motivation that propels me to proceed with this journey. So Lord, help me.

August 09, 2005

The Postmodern Postmortem (Part 2)

This portion of my analysis will be a socio-historical observation of the ecclesiastical climate in Malaysia/Singapore spanning several decades. My purpose is to discern, as it were, the direction in which the Church in Malaysia and Singapore has moved in relation to the wider socio-historical context. Why Malaysia and Singapore together? Because we share a common history that lasts until August 1965.

Admittedly, such an observation can be construed as being arbitrary at best, and rightly so. Furthermore, no single observation (let alone a brief one) can capture in totality the essence of a historical reality. So, this is at best a delineation presented by a Malaysian Chinese of the local ecclesiastical direction, attempted in a posture of mortal humility.

The colonial period lasted for several centuries, duringwhich the economic, political and religious impact on local soil constituted the defining reference points for the colonised locals. As was to be expected, Western Christianity took root in the same manner. And thus was the commencement of organised Christianity on local ground in the replicated manner of the traditional Western ecclesiastical life. It was no surprise that after a prolonged period of its existence, the people of the land could not identify with Western Christianity. This is not to say that the Church failed to grow. Far from it, many were drawn to the gospel; but together with that, they were also obligated to embrace the cultural imperatives of the imperialists. Also, there were many others who declined to accept “the faith of the white man”.

A stark result of the colonial period was that many actually thought that Jesus was white. Until this day, there is little understanding among grassroots Malaysians/Singaporeans (particularly those less predisposed to formal education) of the historical Jesus as an Asian person. Thus, the Church eventually stood at the verge of decline and the local Christians began to realise the failure of the traditional Church model. The problem with this model was that it was not interacting with local culture. It assumed that all Christianity was to be expressed in a Western form. After all, Christianity came as a religion of the West.

Subsequently, in the early 1980s, the Church Growth Movement crept into the local ecclesiastical scene. They saved the day. There was thereafter an influx of people into the Church once again, especially with the rise of the megachurches. The megachurches in Malaysia and Singapore are still vigorously growing in numbers, for they are in persistent interaction with culture.

However, they have failed to consider several factors. Firstly, they are interacting not with local culture, but with popular Western culture. Essentially, they are propagating a different form of imperialism, shifting from high-culture imperialism to low-culture imperialism (which could be worse?). Admittedly, their success is numerically phenomenal. It is no surprise, since Jesus is now “cool” and makes his glorious presence felt in multi-million dollar auditoriums. Also, I find it ironic that within this circle, Western postmodernism, which is acknowledged as a problem (at worst) and a challenge (at best) in the West, is embraced as the “in-thing”! So it’s now cool to be postmodern even if we have no proper idea about what it actually is? Secondly, the megachurch has failed to understand the purpose of contextualisation. I think it is important for Christians to understand the difference between contextualisation as an enterprise of making the gospel comprehensible and contextualisation as an enterprise of making the gospel acceptable. There is always something “in-the-face” about the person of Christ; but this element has been obliterated through a popular rendition of the gospel based on the latter-type contextualisation.

To be fair, the Church Growth Movement is not confined to the megachurches alone. Even the traditional-type churches have taken heed of the creeds of this movement. It is not uncommon to see local traditional church leaders shopping for various ecclesiastical mechanisms that are almost guaranteed to yield numerical growth. Perhaps traditional church leaders are simply facing up to the pressure imposed by the sheer sizes of neighbouring megachurches. These traditional churches have chosen “the middle way” between the preservation of tradition and embracing the “cultural creeds” of the Church Growth Movement. This is rather typical of the Asian mentality, which often seeks to synthesise seemingly contradictory ideas through fusion. I suppose if numerical results were the only consideration, this is not such a bad idea. But embracing both the traditional model and the Church Growth model is also to engage one’s self with the potential pitfalls of both models.

Of course, the Church Growth Movement is still yielding numerical results even now...they are marching on and "taking the nation for Christ". But increasingly, the more discerning churchgoers are beginning to perceive an emotional/psychological dislocation within themselves. They feel used and manipulated. They feel as if they are objects placed in factory production lines that are expected to “look” a certain way in order to be acknowledged as “fully mature Christians”. They are expected to worship in a certain way, exercise a certain kind of hyper-spirituality, be participative in a certain number of formalised church programmes…failing which, “so-and-so has backslidden”. It is almost as if they have to pass the quality assurance test before they are imprinted with barcodes and delivered into the marketplace. The resonance of this phenomenon with a dominant segment of modern American Evangelicalism is unmistakable, hence the shift from high-culture imperialism to low-culture imperialism.

Note: Lest my contentions be misconstrued, I want to qualify this here: It is not the essence of the gospel of Christ that I am critiquing here, but rather, the embodiment of this gospel. The issue in question here is not about the gospel itself, but rather, its cultural expression. I do not understand how such meaningful discussions can sometimes lead to an unnecessary confusion of categories by equally well-meaning people, but I seek to avoid this.


I have more to say about finding a third way as an alternative to both the traditional ecclesiastical model and the Church Growth model. It is really, as Os Guinness says, about discerning the difference between church growth and Church Growth. But for now, it would suffice to say that with the present dominance of the traditional model and the modern Church Growth model (and the accompanying "pseudo-fusion models" along the continuum), more than one person I know have been burnt.

Enough said for now, I guess…until my next entry…

August 08, 2005

The Postmodern Postmortem (Part 1)

So there is much conversation taking place in matters pertaining to postmodernity and its host of variant expressions. But what does this mean for us, people of Asia? Do we have a postmodernity of which to speak? My take on this issue is that we have no postmodernity.

In the first place, we possess no firsthand historical reality of the Enlightenment, and therefore, no modernity. The modernity we do have is that which has been swept onto our shores as a result of the colonial era. What we have is, as it were, the debris of modernity. And even so, this debris has mutated over the past decades as it took root in the local context. And yes, the onus is upon Asian Christians to delineate our own understanding of our local modernities.

In the second place, whilst postmodernity is a reality, it feeds on the creeds of modernity. Perhaps Anthony Giddens is right to contend that postmodernity is simply an extension of and an extreme reaction towards modernity. It is an expression of disillusionment towards modern assumptions that were previously held to be almost a priori truth. To be more defamatory about it, postmodernity is a parasitic existence. There would not be a postmodernity without modernity itself. But of course, this does not mean that postmodernity is anything less than a social reality. All said, this assessment is true probably only insofar as concerns the West.

I am increasingly beginning to notice that when people in Asia refer to “postmodernity”, they are invariantly referring to relativism or subjectivism (perhaps a self-validating observation that Asia has no understanding of what it means to be postmodern!). It may perhaps be beneficial to momentarily pause to find the source from whence comes our relativism or subjectivism. Relativism and subjectivism are perhaps the results of the permeation of a host of philosophical and religious ideas in society. Whilst pluralism is a relatively new phenomenon in the West (probably having emerged only after the era of Christendom), when has Asia not been pluralistic? So perhaps, Asian relativism and subjectivism have nothing to do with postmodernity; it is probably just the way we have been all along. Perhaps on things pertaining to how pluralism is to be dealt with, the West needs to learn from Asia (?)

But one thing that has been carved in our historical consciousness is the era of colonialism. And maybe our challenge lies in interacting with post-colonialism rather than post-modernity itself. My immediate response to post-colonialism in relation to local Christianity is this: the major struggle for the Asian Church is that of critiquing the impact of the imperialistic gospel we have received from the colonial era.

Wait a moment; let me switch modes. **Greek mode off, English mode on** All right...here we go...

I think it is time we undress the packaging of the Western Christianity we have inherited. For every Asian person that has happily embraced the gospel in Western garb, many others have probably been turned away by the “we-know-better-so-you-better-listen-to-us-or-else-you’ll-burn-in-hell” approach. In my assessment, the local Christians are not to be blamed for propagating the gospel in this manner. Because this is the only gospel we have received, and we evangelise the way we have been evangelised. But we have attained a certain level of maturity now, so we can look back to our colonial parents and say “Thank you dad and mum, but we don’t think we want to do it the way you did (although we truly do appreciate you)”.

Christianity has been taking root in Asia for many decades now. Thus we must have sufficiently matured to arrive at this point of self-critique.

Or haven’t we?

A Meme for Me...Me?

I cannot for the life of me understand why a meme is called thus. Why is it not called a "youyou", or for the cultivation of communal harmony, a "wewe"? Nevertheless, I have been entrusted with the noble task of responding to this one, and I intend to fulfill it with undivided integrity. So here goes... 1) Total Number of Books You Own: This is, in all seriousness and honesty, a difficult question to answer. My shelf is packed with books lying in various positions - horizontal, vertical, and other unwarranted positions (while we are at it, may I presumptuously acknowledge herein that I have a very merciful mother). By my rough estimation, my shelf probably holds no less than 500 volumes or thereabout, consisting of both series and monographs.

My books range across various genres and categories. Offhand, I see books on theology, secular philosophy, eastern philosophy, eastern religions, reference tools (encyclopedias, dictionaries, concordances), music, sociology, history, stories, novels, dogs, and uncategorised books. Have I mentioned theology?

2) The Last Book You've Bought:
"Ladies and gentlemen, my name is Sherman. I am a bibliophile. I have never been clean; not even for a day." And everyone in the circle says "Welcome Sherman". And everyone claps. If I consistently tried to keep track of the last book I bought, I probably would have much less time to read the books on my shelf. I think about one fifth of my room space is occupied by books, and another two fifths by a desk, a cabinet, and a chair. The other two fifths is play space for my dogs. Since there is no more room for a bed, I sleep on the floor. You get the idea.

All said, I think the last book I bought was:
[Note: Click on the books for further information.]






3) The Last Book You've Read:
The last book I have read was:


This book was a gift from someone I deeply honour. Among the many things that I would like to think he means to me (role model, example, etc), I know that he is most honoured to simply be called my friend...thank you, friend.


And it goes without saying, any book he puts in your hands is a must-read, so it gets to jump the queue.

4) Five Books that Mean a Lot to You:








[For those who really need
this: insert bible here.]








5) Tag Five People and Have Them Fill This Out on Their Blogs:
Here goes (in alphabetical order)...

Daniel Ng

Doulos Paul Lee

Sivin Kit

Err...okay, I don't have many friends who blog.

August 06, 2005

Born Out of Weblog

Yes, as a matter of fact, I do have something else to say for the day. Can you hear the wedding Dells ring? If you do, it would be because this thing is on its way to my doorstep in a week or so:


Dell Inspiron 700M

This piece of equipment will be invariantly responsible for ensuring my consistency in blogging when I am on the move. But still, I must clarify that the primary motivation for this acquisition is not blogging. You see, more than half of my "official" work is almost entirely dependent upon the computer, undesirably but realistically so.

Therefore, for those who may be misperceived by virtue of the proximity of time between the commencement of my weblog and the purchase of this equipment, I unmistakably declare thus: my new Dell Inspiron 700M is born out of weblog.

And one most important thing: it is a gift. Thank you so much, sis. Beyond what you never fail to do, you are deeply loved and appreciated simply for who you are.

The Furkids




Oh...is this where I should say something? All right then...

Maltese: His name is Chayim, affectionately known as "Yim Boy" or just "Boy". Weighs around 3.3kg (he's a lapdog; short of being called a laptop). He is one and a half years' old. Tends to be rather defensive when confronted with strangers, as are most small breed dogs. His ambition is to be feared as anyone would fear a rottweiler.

Cocker Spaniel: Her name is Carissa Charis, affectionately known as "Rissa" or just "Girl". Weighs over 6kg and still growing; will probably weigh around 10kg when fully grown. She is just past six months old. Very perky and merry, and will follow any stranger home. Her ambition is to become a lapdog, which is a daunting challenge by virtue of her weight.

As you might have noticed by now, they are both inseparable. Both are rather proficient in performing tricks. But I guess that's more a reflection of an intelligent master than an intelligent dog.

Wait...there's someone else we must not forget here...



Maltese x Shih Tzu: In loving memory of Charis (July 2003-May 2005). Died of congenital kidney failure not too long ago. She had a short but meaningful and happy life. She was loved until her last breath. And still is.

Lower life forms, yes. Nevertheless, their undivided loyalty, innocent trust, and fragile abandonment into their master's hands keep me in touch with the imperative of vulnerability in my own life.


You mean dogs don't go to heaven? There are mountains, streams, and streets in heaven...but no dogs?

Asian Theology - an Oxymoron?

Is there a remote possibility that we can emerge with a theology that is truly Asian? It would be overly presumptuous for me to stake my case on a plain "yes" or "no". But I would invite my fellow friends in the relevant conversations to consider this:

1. How Asian are we that our theology should be truly Asian? Whilst I am myself a Malaysian-born Chinese, my worldview and lifestyle are replete with fingerprints of the Western worldview and civilisation. I think in English, not in Chinese. My bookshelf of about a thousand books carries not a single volume in the Chinese language, because I can neither read nor write Chinese. I may be Asian by racial and geographical affiliation; but how Asian is my worldview?

2. Would an Asian theology even need a theology? Several days ago, I listened to a man who was thoroughly Asian by my subjective standards. He was a former taoist medium who thereafter became a Christian. He was - amidst his life testimony - also asserting truth claims about Christ and his supremacy above "any other spirit". This man neither saw the need for coherent and logical arguments that supported his truth claim nor felt that an experiential rendition of the reality of Christ was at best grossly deficient. As far as his faith was concerned, "My wife was possessed, and no other medium could deliver her. But my Christian daughter came and prayed for her, and my wife was delivered. That's all I need to know...Jesus is real." All he needed to know was Christ the person; he did not need a highly systematised framework of thought about Christ.

So before I ask if it is possible for Asia to emerge with a uniquely Asian theology, I suppose I would have to ask if Asia even needed a theology in the first place. I am afraid that my most noble attempt to derive an Asian theology would be at best a pseudo Asian theology, for the very presupposition of theology (of a systematic kind) assumes the employment of the science of logic (which is not, on any account, Asian in origin and nature).

So does Asia have a place within the framework of her ethos for something that is to be called "theology"? Just asking.

August 05, 2005

New Kid on the Blog

I am still furiously coming to terms with the fact that I let myself be talked into this. I am not sure what I have walked into. Is blogging for those who have something original to say? If so, I am the unlikely candidate. I mean, my blog name itself says it all. Or perhaps blogging is for those who have nothing original to say, but who have an original way of saying it. Perhaps I may fit into this latter category. Just perhaps.

I suppose this, for me, is one of those occasions in our life journey when we start off on a venture just for the kicks. And then we uncover the consequences later. And in the process, we discover something of the "unknown". Just perhaps.

As of now, I have taken the plunge. "Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise, so help me God."

Reality bytes...(what pun?)

August 01, 2005

Sherman's Schedule


About Sherman YL Kuek, OSL
Sherman is an itinerant minister and an Adjunct Lecturer in Christian Theology at Seminary Theoloji Malaysia (STM). He spends much of his time journeying with his friends in reflecting on faith, life, and culture in a profoundly theological and yet simple way. Sherman is presently writing a doctoral thesis on Contextual Theology with Trinity Theological College Singapore. He blogs on www.ShermanKuek.net.



Schedule Last Updated: 10 February 2007



upcoming.jpg
FEBRUARY 2007
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 6)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

04 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

15 - 25 (Thursday - Sunday)
Trip to Kuching - Malaysia

27 (Tuesday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


MARCH 2007
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 6)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Writing of article for publication
Asian Beacon (Christian Magazine), April 2007 issue

03 - 04 (Saturday - Sunday)
Conversation Partner for "Friends in Conversation: A Quiet Revolution of Hope"
Organised by Emergent Malaysia
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

05 (Monday)
Conversation Partner for a public lecture by Brian McLaren
Organised by Emergent Malaysia
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

17 (Saturday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

24 (Saturday)
Engagement Gathering for Sherman & Emmy
Seremban - Malaysia

25 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia


APRIL 2007
Preparation for Lectures in Ecclesiology & Eschatology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

15 (Sunday)
Speaking at Sunday Worship Service
Hebron Presbyterian Church - Johor Bahru, Malaysia

21 (Saturday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


MAY 2007
06 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

# 14 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

22 - 26 (Tuesday - Saturday)
Speaking at Camp Cameron
Fellowship of Evangelical Students
Cameron Highlands - Malaysia

27 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

30 - [02 Jun] (Wednesday - Saturday)
Lectures in Christian Theology I
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban


JUNE 2007
Writing of article for publication
Asian Beacon (Christian Magazine), August 2007 issue

(30 May) - 02 (Wednesday - Saturday)
Lectures in Christian Theology I
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

24 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Grace Presbyterian Church Batu Pahat, Johor - Malaysia

30 (Saturday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


JULY 2007
01 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

# 02 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

08 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia


AUGUST 2007
05 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 1)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

# 07 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

12 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 2)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

19 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 3)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

26 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 4)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia


SEPTEMBER 2007
# 04 (Tuesday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

09 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 5)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

16 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 6)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

23 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 7)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

30 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 8)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia


OCTOBER 2007
Preparation for Lectures in Christian Doctrines
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

Writing of article for publication
Asian Beacon (Christian Magazine), December 2007 issue

07 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 9)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

# 15 (Tuesday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

20 (Saturday)
Graduation Service
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

21 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 10)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

24 - 27 (Wednesday - Saturday)
Lectures in Christian Doctrines
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban
Venue: Malaysian Care - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

28 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 11)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia


NOVEMBER 2007
03 (Saturday)
Holy Matrimony of Sherman & Emmy
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

04 (Sunday)
Facilitating a Course on Authentic Spirituality (Session 12)
Klang Wesley Methodist Church - Selangor, Malaysia

11 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

18 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

# 19 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


DECEMBER 2007
17 - 19 (Monday - Wednesday)
Speaking at Youth Camp
Jubilee Presbyterian Church - Singapore


REGULAR LECTURES AT SEMINARI THEOLOJI MALAYSIA 2007
January - May
Fridays 0900 - 1215 hours
Christian Anthropology & Pneumatology

June - October
To be informed
Ecclesiology & Eschatology


# Appointment / Engagement to be finalised




past.jpg
2006 Schedule
JANUARY 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Writing Lent Meditations
Board of Worship and Music (Trinity Annual Conference)
The Methodist Church of Malaysia

20
Commencement of Lectures in
Theological Prolegomena & Theology Proper
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban


FEBRUARY 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Writing Lent Meditations
Board of Worship and Music (Trinity Annual Conference)
The Methodist Church of Malaysia

08 - 11
Lectures in Christian Theology II
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban


MARCH 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Preparation for Guest Lectures in Theological Reflections on Youth Ministry
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

Preparation for Guest Lectures in Spiritual Formation and Discipleship
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

06
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

22
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


APRIL 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

03
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

09
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

16
Confirmation in the Local Conference at Easter Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

17
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

20 - 25
Entertaining a guest at home
Seremban - Malaysia

28 - (01 May)
TUMC Family Camp
Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan - Malaysia


MAY 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Preparation for Lectures in Christology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

(28 April) - 01
TUMC Family Camp
Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan - Malaysia

02
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

07
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

08
Guest Lecture in Theological Reflections on Youth Ministry (Recording)
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

14
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Grace Presbyterian Church, Batu Pahat, Johor - Malaysia

15
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

21
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Hebron Presbyterian Church, Johor Bahru - Malaysia

22 - 26
Sixth Asia Lausanne Conference on Evangelism (ALCOE VI)
Caliraya Re-creation Center, Lumban, Laguna - Philippines

28
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Bangsar Lutheran Church, Kuala Lumpur - Malaysia
[thereafter meeting with Cross Generation Camp (PJEFC) organisers]

29 & 30
Guest Lecture in Spiritual Formation & Discipleship
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban


JUNE 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Preparation for Lectures in Christology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

04 - 09
Speaking in Youth Discipleship School
English Speaking Presbytery
The Presbyterian Church of Malaysia

09 - 13
Vacational Retreat with Friends
Cameron Highlands - Malaysia

11
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
All Souls Church (Anglican), Cameron Highlands - Malaysia

18
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

22
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

24
Speaking on Postcolonial Orthodoxy
Emergent Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur

28
Commencement of Lectures in Christology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban


JULY 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

10
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

20
Speaking at Holy Communion Service
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

28 - 30
Speaking at Cross Generation Camp
Petaling Jaya Evangelical Free Church
Port Dickson - Malaysia


AUGUST 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 4)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

06
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

07
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

18 - 20
Speaking at the National Youth Counselors' Retreat
The Methodist Church of Malaysia
The Pines Resort, Fraser's Hill - Malaysia

28
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


SEPTEMBER 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 5)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

03 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Emmanuel Church (Presbyterian), Muar, Johor - Malaysia

11 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

24 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Hebron Presbyterian Church, Johor Bahru - Malaysia

25 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore


OCTOBER 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 5)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

09 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

15 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Christian Life Gospel Centre, Petaling Jaya - Malaysia

18 (Wednesday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

20 (Friday)
Graduation Dinner
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

21 (Saturday)
Graduation Day
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

22 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia


NOVEMBER 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 6)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Preparation for Lectures in Christian Anthropology & Pneumatology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

Preparation for Lectures in Christian Theology I
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

06 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

08 (Wednesday)
Speaking on the Doctrine of God I
Student Christian Fellowship
International Medical University - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

15 (Wednesday)
Speaking on the Doctrine of God II
Student Christian Fellowship
International Medical University - Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

20 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

28 - 30 (Tuesday - Thursday)
Family Vacation
Cameron Highlands, Malaysia


DECEMBER 2006
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 6)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

02 - 03 (Saturday - Sunday)
Family Vacation
Genting Highlands, Malaysia

07 - 10 (Thursday - Sunday)
Speaking at YouthQuake IV
The National Youth Conference of the Trinity Annual Conference
The Methodist Church of Malaysia
Kuala Kubu Baru, Malaysia

15 - [02 Jan] (Friday - Tuesday)
Vacational Visitation
Yangon - Myanmar


REGULAR LECTURES AT SEMINARI THEOLOJI MALAYSIA 2006
January - May 2006
Fridays 0900 - 1215 hours
TH1A Theological Prolegomena & Theology Proper

June - October 2006
Wednesdays 0900 - 1215 hours
TH1B Christology


2007 Schedule
JANUARY 2007
Writing of Doctoral Thesis (Chapter 5)
To be submitted to Trinity Theological College Singapore

Writing of article for publication
Asian Beacon (Christian Magazine), February 2007 issue

[15 Dec] - 02 (Friday - Tuesday)
Vacational Visitation
Yangon - Myanmar

05 - 08 (Friday - Monday)
Community Reunion / Gathering
Cameron Highlands, Malaysia

13 - 15 (Saturday - Monday)
Lectures in Christian Theology I (Part One)
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban
Venue: PJEFC - Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

19 (Friday)
Commencement of Lectures in
Christian Anthropology & Pneumatology
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban

19 (Friday)
Speaking at Jeremiah School
The National Youth Discipleship School of the Trinity Annual Conference
The Methodist Church of Malaysia
Methodist Centre, Port Dickson - Malaysia

20 - 22 (Saturday - Monday)
Lectures in Christian Theology I (Part Two)
Theological Education by Extension
Seminari Theoloji Malaysia, Seremban
Venue: PJEFC - Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

28 (Sunday)
Preaching at Sunday Worship Service
Taman Ujong Methodist Church, Seremban - Malaysia

29 (Monday)
Academic Research & Personal Consultation
Singapore

Sherman YL Kuek

Sherman YL Kuek, OSL


Sherman's Seal (No Background).jpg
An itinerant minister. An Adjunct Lecturer in Christian Theology at a seminary. A student in Contextual Theology seeking to inspire the world to live in the way of Christ.

A fellow pilgrim. A friend. Journeying towards relational, formative, missional, authentic, transformative, meaningful, kingdomic and communal faith in the redemptive Spirit of Christ.

I entreat your frequent visitations, for it is in the company of community that life is authentically formed and meaning is shared.



SHERMAN'S SHUFFLES

CRUCIAL CATEGORIES

VALIANT VOICES

Augustine.jpg Luther.jpg Calvin.jpg SorenKierkegaard.jpg Bonhoeffer.jpg C.S.Lewis.jpg Barth.jpg JohnPaulII.jpg Benedictus.jpg RowanWilliams.jpg
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.2