« August 2007 | Main | July 2008 »

September 28, 2007

The Light of Promise

Darkness.jpg
These are dark days. Darkness covers the earth like an indelible layer of black mist, concealing all the secrets of the earth’s beauty. One cannot help but gaze at this situation with a regretful sense of despair and helplessness. To wish that there was a humungous vacuum cleaner that could suck out the mist of darkness to restore light and to bring hope is akin to cultivating a wishful make belief.


As much as it might seem like a hopeless dream, one must believe that brighter days lie ahead. Not just because embracing this dream helps us to get through today with an adequate measure of emotional survival, but also because this dream is a promise that is real. For it to bring true hope, it must be implicitly understood that this dream is real. A dream that carries only the prospects of wishful thinking constitutes nothing more than the fantasies of a foolish man whose feet aren’t planted on the ground.


But because we have a real dream which will be translated into reality at the appointed time, we must keep dreaming. It is this dream, together with the believing that the dream is true, that will propel us to keep waddling ourselves through the darkness of the mist that has covered the world, in the understanding that one day the light of promise will shine through.


When it's as dark as it can get, then you'll know that it can only get brighter.

September 27, 2007

Caution in Justice

justice.jpgIn your pursuit of justice, do not disgrace your God. It is just a very thin line that separates justice from vengeance.


Remember also that the world is full of different kinds of people. There are those angelic-like creatures who may have the darkest motives, and the pure-looking ones who may be the vilest offenders.


As for the less discerning, they just get deceived. For they have no ability to see through material realities.

September 16, 2007

Soul of the Tsunami

Tsunami%20Wave.jpgThe tsunami. One of the catastrophes in human history that will never be forgotten, for it has left thousands upon thousands dead. Without warning.


It is a terror of nature.


It comes unannounced and renders its fiercest and mightiest blow. It sweeps everything out of place, even the heaviest objects fastened to the sturdiest grounds. It knows not what mercy is. It just blows, sweeps… everything.


The tsunami isn’t itself a cause. It is itself an effect created by the rapidly displaced ocean bed. The anger of the rapid displacement translates into a whirlpool of liquidated wrath. And it goes on a murder spree, thrusting the breath out of everything within its range that is alive.


What was once water, a much needed component of life, has now become a personification of terror, driving fear deep into the heart of every human soul for the rest of human history.


Some people are like tsunamis, displaced very much earlier in their lives, now causing that roaring stir of a mass of killer liquid. Every life they get close to, they kill. The soul within them is one of anger, hatred, and emotional violence.


They can’t help themselves, for they’re not a cause - they’re an effect.


And they can’t stop themselves either, for they’re not a cause - they’re an effect.


Like a tsunami, they emerge, wreaking disorder and chaos. And then they dissipate and disappear, leaving behind a screaming calmness as if they were never there. And its survivors are left trying to make sense of the new chaos they find themselves in.

September 14, 2007

From Sauntering to Trudging

TrudgingThroughStorm.jpgI was sauntering gracefully in the beauty of the sunshine, where shadows would follow me as I walked and linger with me as I stood still.


Those were peaceful and easy moments, for there was a centred feeling like never before within the depth of my soul. Certainly there were minute whispers of unease that threatened to dispose the beauty of the moment, but they never succeeded.


Some storms befall with little or no signs of warning. All this time, even when the breeze began to throw its blows in my face a little harder, I knew not that a storm was brewing, for I was simply enjoying the beauty of the moment. Just being there in the present.


The storm came unannounced. I was taken unprepared. So now I'm trudging step by step, in hope of shelter, in search of refuge. In search of a source of protection which can hide me from the tossing violence of the storm.


Storms... they eventually cease. They must; for such is the way of nature.

September 12, 2007

Cry of the Soul

CryoftheSoul.jpgThere are moments when a surge of thoughts pervade my mind, and there is so much to articulate. Yet there are some emotions to which no vocabulary can adequately do justice.


These are emotions so common to humankind, and yet the finer nuances of these emotions that are unique to the individual person cannot be simplistically captured through words. Thus, once again, the power of language breaks down.


Consequently, all that the heart affords is an inner groan. A groan propelled by a deep longing for answers to age-old questions. Existential questions. Questions that few God-fearing Christians dare to ask for fear of being dismissed as "unfaithful". No, we do not advance such queries in the midst of other "believers". These are the rules of the game.


But tell me if this is perhaps true, that even as a pilgrim on the journey of faith, I am essentially wandering and groping amidst the storms of life to seek a simple answer to the profound concern of the human soul: Who Am I?

September 10, 2007

The Essence of Time

sphere.jpgChange is the essence of time. And the present is the dividing line between your past and your future. In looking back, you see a story. In looking ahead, you witness possibilities.


You wonder if the future must look anything like the past, and if desired change is perhaps a possibility. The past carries with it a somewhat bitter innertia with an aftertaste that helplessly lingers. But the only way to move beyond the innertia of the past is to move forward even if each step constitutes but a heavy plod.


Naturally, your endeavour to venture into the future is rendered futile in the light of your helplessness. You feel yourself weak. That is only to be expected, for inasmuch as the past is no longer deemed desirable, the future carries with it an air of fear. Hence, you find yourself stumped in the state of the present, not desiring to move on (even if you are aware that the present provides a glimpse of future possibilities).


Know that your life is not yours to build. Neither does it belong to you. The One who authored it is the very same One who shall bring its ordained future to fulfillment. Perhaps what you need is not a spirit of strength or determination, but a spirit of obedient abandonment.

September 9, 2007

What of You?

repentance.jpgThere are those who think they are following the way of the Kingdom. And they take pride in just how Christian they are. And they have the evidence to show it. But when confronted with the greater demands of Jesus, they trivialise them by saying, “Nooo, Jesus didn’t really mean that! He was just exaggerating his message so we’d get the point. We’ve already got the point, so this demand isn’t to be taken so literally”. But it’s also strange how these very same people interpret the promises of Christ literally.


Then there are those who deeply desire to follow the way of the Kingdom but realise just how handicapped they are. They look into the greater demands of Christ and are bewildered at what he asks of them. Then they contemplate on the unfathomable love of Christ and realise that they owe it to walk in obedience towards him. But they’re damaged icons, unable to truly render to Christ that which he asks. Not because they refuse to, but because they do not possess the capacity to do so. They look to heaven, beat their chests, and say, “Lord, have mercy upon me, a sinner”.


Christ looks to the first and says, “What of you?”, and then he looks to the second and says, “Come, run into my arms”.

September 4, 2007

Companions in Suffering

HoldingHands.jpgAs a sufferer, I’ve gradually discovered that there’s one thing people like us need beyond anything any counselor or doctor can provide. We need fellow companions to journey with us in our suffering.


Companions who will be the ears of God to hear us, the hands of God to hold us, and the feet of God to take us where we need to go.


The language that emanates from this companionship amidst the untold suffering is a language of love, of deep spirituality, of God.

September 3, 2007

Church Architecture

I've just ripped the following post wholesale from Pearlie's blog. It's so well-written, I've nothing to add to it. Thanks, Pearlie.


We visited a different denomination church today - the Petaling Jaya Evangelical Free Church. It was a new experience.


The order of service was almost the same except for the Holy Communion and Parish Notice happening right after Praise and Worship and before the sermon. There were no bulletins to refer to and I wasn't used not knowing what's going to happen next.


The church set up was different, i.e. not the traditional set up: it does not have a cross or an altar. The language used was also different: the sanctuary is called an auditorium and the pastor spoke about invoking Jesus in our lives. I didn't realise but now that I checked the bible and the word invoke is used in translation. I am just not used to it though. For me, when the word invoke is used, it carries the picture and flavour of calling upon the powers of magic. I don't know - I may have a wrong conception over this in the first place.


I can now tell how "traditional" I am when it comes to these things. I think I should feel more at ease in an Anglican or Orthodox church.


Eversince Rev Gan Meng Tee - who used to be our pastor, now serving the Lord in Melbourne, Australia - introduced me to church architecture a few years ago, I became quite intrigued by it. I have since learnt that a church should have an apse, altar, sanctuary, chancel, transept, pulpit, lectern, nave and narthex. Not all would agree with me I am sure, but there are theological reasons why old churches and cathedrals are built the way they do. I believe that traiditional church architeture has its theological background and practical purposes as well, which in my opinion should be preferred compared to the modern fan-style auditorium set up.


flrpln.jpg


Apse: the rounded alcove behind the altar. This is where the cross is place and where our worship should centre, i.e. upon God. Churches which do not have a cross at the front believes that with God being omnipresent, it does not matter where we direct our worship to. Moreover, some of them believe that by having a cross hung at the front may encourage idolatry. To me, the cross is a symbol of God's love and sacrifice for us. At any moment in my service that I am selfishly aware and conscious of myself, I look to the cross to remind myself that I am not my own.


Altar: the ceremonial table at which the Eucharist or Holy Communion is celebrated. In the Methodist churches however, the altar is where the collection is placed as an offering to God, in line with the OT sacrifices and offerings, while the Holy Communion cup and bread is placed on another table in front of the altar at the chancel. These items are holy, separated for the Lord's use. It is not that they are powerful or "magical" so to speak, but they are set aside for the Lord's use only and for no other purposes. There are those who abuse the tables and the communion railings.


Sanctuary: the front part of the church from which the service is conducted, as distinct from the nave, where the congregation sits. In the more modern traditional churches however, the term ‘sanctuary’ is often used to mean both chancel and nave because the two are not architecturally distinct.


Chancel: the front part of the church from where the service is conducted, as distinct from the nave. The chancel is usually an elevated platform, usually three steps up from the nave. There are churches where the pastors would not allow anything other than teaching and preaching, leading hymns and songs to be held in the chancel. In some churches, the chancel is usually called the stage, which I felt it should not. The worship of God should not be reduced to a show or presentation or entertainment. After all, a stage is where presentations are staged.


Transept: back then, they had require an increased space near the chancel to accommodate the large numbers of clergy, choirs, or members of religious orders. The result was a space between the chancel and the nave that extends beyond the side walls, giving the church a cruciform floorplan, i.e. the shape of a cross viewed from above. The center of the transept is called the crossing, the area connecting the nave to the chancel. The ushers act as priests of God, bringing in the offering of the people, crossing over from the nave to the chancel to be placed on the altar.


Pulpit: in the more traditional churches, there are two speaker’s stands in the front of the church. The one on the left, as viewed by the congregation is called the pulpit. It is used by clergy to read the gospel and preach the sermon. It is placed in at the side because the focus and centre of worship is still God, hence, where the apse and the altar are placed. Once I was worship leading standing in the center of the chancel. The pastor had to advise us against it and since then we were more aware of it. In the modern auditorium churches, the clergy and laity would usually take centerstage, and in most instances, there is no pulpit. The preacher would use a cordless mic and move about as he speaks.


Lectern: the stand on the right from which readings or parish notices are given. The word lectern comes from the Latin word meaning ‘to read,’ because the lectern primarily functions as a reading stand. It is used by lay people to read the scripture lessons, to lead the congregation in prayer, and to make announcements. The differentiation is given because of the importance of the word of God to the people that the pulpit has to be separated from the other readings and announcements.


Nave: the main body of the church, where the congregation sits and gathers for worship, as opposed to the front part of the church from which the service is led.


Narthex: the historic term for what might otherwise be called the foyer or entry way of the church.


With all these, I felt that church architecture plays an important role in worship and service. It is also practical for the purpose of Holy Communion and coming forward to be prayed for. It requires us to physically go to God and not sit where we are and let God come to us, particularly during the Holy Communion. It is the coming together of the body of Christ, communing and remembering Jesus who gave us his body and his blood for our salvation.

September 2, 2007

Prayer in the Darkness

AShadow.jpgHear me, O Lord, in the stillness of my anguish. Hear the cry of my spirit as the darkness of the night besets my soul.


Hear me, O Lord, and do not turn your face away from one who seeks you to his final breath.


Hear me, and have mercy upon me. I will cry out to you from the farthest wilderness, and my soul will keep thirsting for a glimpse of your light.


Lord, have mercy;
Christ, have mercy;
Lord, have mercy.


May your presence – unseen, unfelt, untouched – remain with me through the valley of the shadow of death, through the darkness of the night. And your Spirit be my light.

September 1, 2007

Questions on RoH

ROHLogo.jpgAlwyn is wise to foresee questions regarding RoH, which he advanced through email.


I've attempted to reply these questions, although my reply is not officially representative of the RoH Team's position. Given the ethos of these beautiful people with me on the team, however, I'm quite sure they'd be rather happy with my approach in tackling these answers. So here's my reply:


1. What sets RoH apart from, say, Friends In Conversation/Emergent and Agora?

Agora is a local church-based effort to engage society from a rather explicitly Reformed perspective. It is an admirable effort although thoroughly Western and unapologetically Evangelical in its approach (but they certainly believe in apologetics, haha).


Friends in Conversation was exactly what it spells - a conversation - as is Emergent. And out of that conversation was birthed a shared dream by a small group of thinkers to rise beyond Western categories in its response towards societal realities in Malaysia.


One main difference between Agora's approach and RoH's approach is the language used. I think Agora would be quite happy to rest with high-sounding theological language, whereas ROH will represent an express effort to articulate in the language of the people.


Also, Agora uses already pre-established Western theological categories in responding to societal realities, whereas RoH seeks to not do that.


Finally, Agora has, in a way engaged much of the social-scientific arena; but RoH is attempting to do that much more seriously by engaging the wisdom of sisters like Tricia, Veron, and Rachel in our theological interactions.


By the way, may I add, it's of no coincidence that they are sisters, not brothers - the demographics of the team has been very carefully configured.


2. What is your doctrinal statement (if any)?

There is no necessity for a doctrinal statement in this effort, because we are constructing theologies as Malaysian Christians, not Protestant or Roman Catholic (which are in themselves Western realities).


The one thing that has brought us together and which holds us together is our being Malaysian and Christian. As Malaysian Christians, there must be things we can articulate in common without splitting hairs on our Western historical realities and their resulting positions.


But this does not mean we are planning to evade all the differences we may have. RoH represents an ecumenical effort. In an ecumenical effort, there is an implicit understanding that no single individual is expected to compromise his doctrinal positions as we all enter into an effort in a spirit of dialogue. But yet, there is also an implicit understanding of humility in our dialogue, which means that our position is open to constructive challenge and positive shifts.


One most crucial attitude in this effort is that of listening to the other with open hearts before we respond with discontention towards anything we're unfamiliar with.


3. What is your view of the differences between Protestants and Roman Catholics?

We have vast differences. But far more similarities than differences.


Within the Great Tradition, there is a common stream, a very broad stream, that runs throughout Orthodoxy, Catholicism and Protestantism. That alone provides us with ample space to move together in like-heartedness and single-mindedness in this effort.


The issues of the papacy or the veneration of the saints are too far removed from the realities of Malaysian society for us to even want to discuss at this point of time. Issues like Islam Hadhari, the Federal Constitution as opposed to Syariah Law, the poor and marginalised in our nation, children at risk, the Orang Asli, besides others, are things we hold closer to our hearts as Malaysian Christians.


Besides, we have Protestants (like me) who hold the Holy Father in higher regard than most Protestant bishops we know, and who are very happy to practise iconography (which includes something of the veneration of the saints).


What I'm saying is that we are Christians who are willing to cross over. Recently, Veron (one of the RoH Team members) kindly conceded to come over to [the seminary I teach in] to share what it means to her that she's Catholic and ecumenical in her faith. Something extremely beautiful was birthed from that conversation.


The spirit in which we are working together in RoH is rather idealistic, admittedly. We are trying to embody an eschatological oneness which probably has yet to truly exist in our various ecclesiastical contexts; but it is only because the Roh who is orchestrating this effort is the eschatological Spirit of God himself... and we're foolish enough to flow along.

Sherman YL Kuek



Sherman's Seal (No Background).jpg
A theological researcher. A conversationist on theology, spirituality, and culture.

A pilgrim seeking to inspire the world to live in the way of Christ.



A friend. Journeying towards relational, formative, missional, authentic, transformative, meaningful, kingdomic and communal faith in the redemptive Spirit of Christ.

I entreat your frequent visitations, for it is in the company of community that life is authentically formed and meaning is shared.



SHERMAN'S SHUFFLES

CRUCIAL CATEGORIES

VALIANT VOICES

Augustine.jpg Luther.jpg Calvin.jpg SorenKierkegaard.jpg Bonhoeffer.jpg C.S.Lewis.jpg Barth.jpg JohnPaulII.jpg Benedictus.jpg RowanWilliams.jpg


thinkingblogger2ql6.jpg





Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.